映像資料   FAQ   メーリングリスト   お問い合わせ  
  English
ARCについて
寄付・会員募集
ボランティア
 

 we can not know when natural disaster breaks out where from now. Animals depend and receive double suffering from natural disaster and the administration and keeper who consideration chipped, the every time,

Because it is the society of a person the human life priority may be unavoidable.

However, keeper oneself and the administration authority, which issues compulsory refuge advice to the keeper must think the consideration to the animals, that is bred neatly , in the condition which is near imprisonment under the control of a/the person, contrary to subjective will(The natural way as the creature that is born in nature, leave descendant, grow up, and be going to die.).

Is not it a natural necessary case, to put in the correspondence to animals into the measure manual of the administration at the time of a disaster? 

We think, that it is when administration should put out an evident view for treatment, to the animals that the refuge resident is breeding, because administration has almost compelling force and issue refuge advice

We must ask right or wrong of the case to the public opinion widely, if administration asserts that it is an adequate case to instruct as we will make breeding animals leaving behind.

And, it is thinking that it is connected to that asks right or wrong of itself to breed animals.


animal rights center  
 
  linkfree
  add your favorite(Explore) →click
LastUpdate 05/04/25

Animal Rights Center (ARC) since1987 (C)Copyrights1998-2005 ARC all rights reserved